<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lance Armstrong Criticizes David Walsh On His Latest Propaganda Piece</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bicycle.net/2007/lance-armstrong-book-david-walsh/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bicycle.net/2007/lance-armstrong-book-david-walsh</link>
	<description>cycling news, product reviews, original bicycling essays, bike podcasts and video -- Tour de France 2010</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 19:29:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.bicycle.net/2007/lance-armstrong-book-david-walsh#comment-25311</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bicycle.net/2007/lance-armstrong-book-david-walsh/#comment-25311</guid>
		<description>pretty easy to challenge any argument that Lance Armstrong raced his tour victories clean.  if he&#039;s willing to publicly admit that none of his competitors were dirty, then fine, 7 victories could be explained. if not, how does he or anyone else explain the victories.  in fact, we know based on admissions that some of the top competitors in the sport during his victories were dirty. hence, to beat these riders, Lance himself had to be dirty. cycling is a dirty sport. until something is done to change this, it will remain such. end of story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pretty easy to challenge any argument that Lance Armstrong raced his tour victories clean.  if he&#8217;s willing to publicly admit that none of his competitors were dirty, then fine, 7 victories could be explained. if not, how does he or anyone else explain the victories.  in fact, we know based on admissions that some of the top competitors in the sport during his victories were dirty. hence, to beat these riders, Lance himself had to be dirty. cycling is a dirty sport. until something is done to change this, it will remain such. end of story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KM REEDE</title>
		<link>http://www.bicycle.net/2007/lance-armstrong-book-david-walsh#comment-19553</link>
		<dc:creator>KM REEDE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 05:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bicycle.net/2007/lance-armstrong-book-david-walsh/#comment-19553</guid>
		<description>WHY WOLD A  CANCER SURVIVOR TAKE SOME  OF THESE      DRUGS? SOME OF THEM DRUGS CAN  CAUSE CANCER</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WHY WOLD A  CANCER SURVIVOR TAKE SOME  OF THESE      DRUGS? SOME OF THEM DRUGS CAN  CAUSE CANCER</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KM REEDE</title>
		<link>http://www.bicycle.net/2007/lance-armstrong-book-david-walsh#comment-19552</link>
		<dc:creator>KM REEDE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 05:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bicycle.net/2007/lance-armstrong-book-david-walsh/#comment-19552</guid>
		<description>BIKE RIDERS UNITE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BIKE RIDERS UNITE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michele "Mic" Capaccioli</title>
		<link>http://www.bicycle.net/2007/lance-armstrong-book-david-walsh#comment-17082</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele "Mic" Capaccioli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 09:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bicycle.net/2007/lance-armstrong-book-david-walsh/#comment-17082</guid>
		<description>Dear Lance Armstrong,
 
I have only recently read your statement regarding the Walsh book and what you have defined as “another unobjective book… Trying to jump on the bandwagon of current publicity surrounding cycling, Walsh now issues a recycled version of two earlier French books that were likewise founded upon a demonstrably false string of sensational, untrue and fabricated allegations”. 
 
Personally, I have to say that you are right when you say “I am sick and tired of those who try to profit off the tactics of smear and guilt by innuendo or association”. I am sick as well when I meet people who try to manufacture the reality and accuse “you” of something that you did not do. Sometimes they use a sort of minestrone in which every single part or member owns his/her role: first, they associate themselves towards something that they see dangerous for their own interests; second, they construct their “truth” by simply thinking and promoting that today’s reality is what the others tell about you and the rest does not count; third, they go “outside” their living rooms and use defamation and innuendo to defend their own interests. They even attack the people who think different by them. The acquire trust and especially the can send the message that if “you” think different by us, you will be “attacked” or isolated. By this behaviour they can send other people not to act, otherwise they could “suffer” the same consequences of those who do not think as them. In addition, they use the other people like they would be cards.
 
I do not like doping practices, because I want to see the sport free from drugs and illegal substances. I would not like to see in the reality people who instigate the others to think that “If he does it, I can do It as well, because today’s society it’s like this”. In a nutshell, the impunity. It seems to me that this is not a strong behaviour, it is a weak behaviour. Today’s reality is composed by several truths and not by an absolute one. In fact, It’s for four years I have learnt to be realistic, by simply recognising that today’s reality can be composed by the cynics, the sceptics, people who do not believe in miracles and by those who manufacture the reality to defend their interests.
 
Every time you, Lance, are accused of doping practices I ask myself “What the heck is that?”. This is a fine irony of course. I honestly believe in you, dear MELLOW JOHNNY and I am not afraid to publicly say that Walsh book is a demonstration of slimy journalism. 
 
Many years ago I received a card from you and the Lance Armstrong Foundation in which there was a precious advice f yours: “I must encourage you to always keep the faith. The faith in your doctors, the faith in the medicine, the faith in your family and most importantly the faith in yourself. This, my friend, is absolutely the best thing you can do for yourself. Your strength gives so many others hope and inspiration, including myself”. So, I would like to “inspire” you by giving you two very important and precious advices taught to me by my father before his death:
 
a)   go ahead, go on, continue to commit your life, your words, your action to words the loneliness. To me it’s a lifetime commitment. Every time you have to face, directly or indirectly, the “tornados” of cynicism and scepticism, those behaviour who want to manufacture the reality, find a genuine and correct solution. It happens sometimes to receive false accuses of smear and guilt by innuendo and/or association. The best answer to “respond” to them is to find the interior force to go on, being surrounded by genuine and correct people. This is the real force of the person and not the law of the group by which “you” can use the others against something or somebody as they would be cards. These others cards when they realise that they have been used for cynical purposes if they are not respectful people could be aloof with the person who “suffered” the actions of false accuses of smear and guilt by innuendo and/or association. This is the target of every person who made a mistake and has decided not to recognise it or to collaborate only to demonstrate to the others the opposite of what himself made;
 
b)   I would be sick and tired of those who try to profit off - even socially - the tactics of smear and guilt by innuendo and/or association. Unfortunately, in the life you cannot meet all sincere, honest and loyal people. It happens to meet “someone” disonest, who continues not to admit his mistake/s, or he does it partially, but at the same time he tries to portrait himself as an individual who completely admitted his mistake/s. Try to be optimistic and please do not forget that outside your house the life can be with no rules, cynical, with cynics and sceptics, with people who manufacture the reality to defend their personal interests by using others as they would be cards and by feeling to them the interest to continue not to act, because they have to achieve the goal for which they study, they behave, they act et cetera.
 
LIVESTRONG Lance, LIVESTRONG.
 
 
Yours faithfully,
 
 
Michele “Mic” Capaccioli.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Lance Armstrong,</p>
<p>I have only recently read your statement regarding the Walsh book and what you have defined as “another unobjective book… Trying to jump on the bandwagon of current publicity surrounding cycling, Walsh now issues a recycled version of two earlier French books that were likewise founded upon a demonstrably false string of sensational, untrue and fabricated allegations”. </p>
<p>Personally, I have to say that you are right when you say “I am sick and tired of those who try to profit off the tactics of smear and guilt by innuendo or association”. I am sick as well when I meet people who try to manufacture the reality and accuse “you” of something that you did not do. Sometimes they use a sort of minestrone in which every single part or member owns his/her role: first, they associate themselves towards something that they see dangerous for their own interests; second, they construct their “truth” by simply thinking and promoting that today’s reality is what the others tell about you and the rest does not count; third, they go “outside” their living rooms and use defamation and innuendo to defend their own interests. They even attack the people who think different by them. The acquire trust and especially the can send the message that if “you” think different by us, you will be “attacked” or isolated. By this behaviour they can send other people not to act, otherwise they could “suffer” the same consequences of those who do not think as them. In addition, they use the other people like they would be cards.</p>
<p>I do not like doping practices, because I want to see the sport free from drugs and illegal substances. I would not like to see in the reality people who instigate the others to think that “If he does it, I can do It as well, because today’s society it’s like this”. In a nutshell, the impunity. It seems to me that this is not a strong behaviour, it is a weak behaviour. Today’s reality is composed by several truths and not by an absolute one. In fact, It’s for four years I have learnt to be realistic, by simply recognising that today’s reality can be composed by the cynics, the sceptics, people who do not believe in miracles and by those who manufacture the reality to defend their interests.</p>
<p>Every time you, Lance, are accused of doping practices I ask myself “What the heck is that?”. This is a fine irony of course. I honestly believe in you, dear MELLOW JOHNNY and I am not afraid to publicly say that Walsh book is a demonstration of slimy journalism. </p>
<p>Many years ago I received a card from you and the Lance Armstrong Foundation in which there was a precious advice f yours: “I must encourage you to always keep the faith. The faith in your doctors, the faith in the medicine, the faith in your family and most importantly the faith in yourself. This, my friend, is absolutely the best thing you can do for yourself. Your strength gives so many others hope and inspiration, including myself”. So, I would like to “inspire” you by giving you two very important and precious advices taught to me by my father before his death:</p>
<p>a)   go ahead, go on, continue to commit your life, your words, your action to words the loneliness. To me it’s a lifetime commitment. Every time you have to face, directly or indirectly, the “tornados” of cynicism and scepticism, those behaviour who want to manufacture the reality, find a genuine and correct solution. It happens sometimes to receive false accuses of smear and guilt by innuendo and/or association. The best answer to “respond” to them is to find the interior force to go on, being surrounded by genuine and correct people. This is the real force of the person and not the law of the group by which “you” can use the others against something or somebody as they would be cards. These others cards when they realise that they have been used for cynical purposes if they are not respectful people could be aloof with the person who “suffered” the actions of false accuses of smear and guilt by innuendo and/or association. This is the target of every person who made a mistake and has decided not to recognise it or to collaborate only to demonstrate to the others the opposite of what himself made;</p>
<p>b)   I would be sick and tired of those who try to profit off &#8211; even socially &#8211; the tactics of smear and guilt by innuendo and/or association. Unfortunately, in the life you cannot meet all sincere, honest and loyal people. It happens to meet “someone” disonest, who continues not to admit his mistake/s, or he does it partially, but at the same time he tries to portrait himself as an individual who completely admitted his mistake/s. Try to be optimistic and please do not forget that outside your house the life can be with no rules, cynical, with cynics and sceptics, with people who manufacture the reality to defend their personal interests by using others as they would be cards and by feeling to them the interest to continue not to act, because they have to achieve the goal for which they study, they behave, they act et cetera.</p>
<p>LIVESTRONG Lance, LIVESTRONG.</p>
<p>Yours faithfully,</p>
<p>Michele “Mic” Capaccioli.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

