WADA Invigorated by USADA Probe


by Judi Rever

MONTREAL, Nov 18, 2012 (AFP) – The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) said
Sunday that sport has the power to expose cheaters, and one of its earliest
crusaders against the drug-soaked culture of cycling has been its founding
president Dick Pound.

WADA Chairman John Fahey lauded a ground-breaking probe by the US
Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) that exposed the supply, use and distribution of
performance-enhancing drugs involving teams associated with Lance Armstrong.

Armstrong, who was accused by the USADA of using drugs and blood
transfusions to cheat, was stripped of his seven Tour de France titles.

Fahey said the investigation resulted in “the most comprehensive,
irrefutable outcome of a culture of doping in cycling and certainly the most
sophisticated sham in the teams associated with Armstrong.

“That indicates that we can achieve outcomes. We can bring things through
to a point where these cheats are exposed.”

Fahey said Pound has been vindicated for the stand he took against
Armstrong and the people who enabled cheating in the sport. But the Canadian
was put under scrutiny by the International Olympic Committee and later sued
by the International Cycling Union (UCI).

“Dick Pound was vocal. He was sued in defamation, in my view in an attempt
to silence him in those days,” Fahey told AFP at a WADA meeting that proposed
changes to the code on anti-doping.

The draft would stiffen sanctions from two to four years for cheaters, and
give WADA the power to investigate cases that national governing bodies refuse
to look at.

“It does have a bit of sobering effect on you if you are going before the
court. He made some statements that there’s now absolutely no doubt had full
substance in them. I have to say that he was dealt with on complaint by
Armstrong by the ethics committee of the IOC of which he is a member. That was
wrong, if you look at it today.”

“So he was certainly vindicated in the stand that he took,” Fahey added.

Pound also attended the Montreal meeting, as did a subdued Pat McQuaid,
president of the International Cycling Union (UCI).

Pound said the USADA investigation was proof that the system could be
effective, and has been embarrassing for the UCI.

“I think USADA’s report indicates what a good and serious agency can do.
That’s a vindication of the system,” he said in his inimitable forthright
manner.

“It’s immensely embarrassing to the UCI that the people who are running the
sport, who were there every day, seeing these athletes and teams for years and
years couldn’t seem to find it. And so now they are, in quotation marks,
‘shocked’,” he said.

Pound acknowledged the bitter push back against efforts to clean up
cheating that he received as chairman of global anti-doping body between 1999
and 2007.

“But the pushback I got was the pushback that I invited as chairman. The
pushback comes from the bad guys, not from the good guys. A number of people
keep saying ‘keep at them’ which is great, and others say ‘oh you’re trampling
on our rights, you’re against cycling, you’re against football,’ – well
they’ve sort of opened their shirts and the bull’s eye is right in the middle
of their chests.”

In response to concerns raised by delegates about the time and costs
associated with effectively cracking down of the scope of cheating in sports,
Pound was unequivocal in urging national governments to take responsibility.

He also said the costs of regulation and testing could be tolerated, given
the spending in other areas.

“So when you sit around and hear them talking about ‘oh we’re all so poor
that we can’t afford even a one percent increase’….it’s like 12 million
dollars for the world governments.”

He also urged the International Olympic Committee to take a tough love
approach.

“Well I think the IOC has sort of punted to some degree to WADA. They don’t
really do any anti-doping tests. They do tests on occasion for the Olympics,
but that’s about it. They’ve been very good at amending their charter to say
that you need to become compliant or you can’t take part but they’re reluctant
to use that power.”

“They’ve been saying…’well you can’t exclude cycling because what about
all the cyclists around the world who aren’t doping?’ Well, it’s tough love.”

Speak Your Mind

*