Oprah Promises Tough Grilling Of Lance Armstrong

lance armstrong_2011
by Fabienne Faur

WASHINGTON, Jan 9, 2013 (AFP) – Lance Armstrong will face a no-holds-barred
interview with Oprah Winfrey, her cable TV network promised Wednesday, as
speculation mounted that the cycling icon might finally confess to being a
drug cheat.

“Armstrong has no editorial control and no question is off-limits,” Nicole
Nichols of Winfrey’s OWN cable TV network told AFP in an email, adding that
the disgraced cyclist is getting no payment for the interview.

Nichols also said the 90-minute interview at Armstrong’s home in Austin,
Texas — to be aired January 17 on the OWN network and online worldwide — “is
not live.”

Asked when it would be recorded, she replied: “We are not confirming any
further details.”

It will be Armstrong’s first interview since he was stripped in October of
his Tour de France titles after the US Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) said he
helped orchestrate the most sophisticated doping program in cycling history.

Late Wednesday, USADA chief executive Travis Tygart described the
sophistication of the doping scheme on “60 Minutes Sports” which included the
use of untraceable cell phones, makeup to hide needle marks and an offer of a
$250,000 donation from Armstrong to USADA in 2004.

Among the subjects touched on in the interview was that Armstrong had been
tipped off by Martial Saugy, the director of a Swiss drug testing laboratory,
about how to beat the EPO test.

“And I asked him ‘Did you give Lance Armstrong and Johan Bruyneel the keys
to defeat the E.P.O. test?’ And he nodded his head yes,” Tygart said.

“As far as we are aware it is totally inappropriate to bring an athlete who
had a suspicious test and explain to them how the test works.”

Last week, The New York Times reported that Armstrong, 41, was considering
publicly admitting that he used banned performance-enhancing drugs, in an
apparent bid to return to competitive sport in marathons and triathlons.
The 60 Minutes Sports episode included a tag at the end of the program,
saying Armstrong had met recently with Tygart to explore the idea of a
“pathway to redemption.”
“We were disappointed he (Armstrong) didn’t come in and be part of the
solution,” Tygart said of Armstrong’s refusal to co-operate with the
investigation. “It’s one of the lowest days of this investigation, quite
honestly.”
While supporters hope the Oprah appearance allows Armstrong to draw a line
under the affair and begin his rehabilitation after a very public fall from
grace, some in the sport were not happy about the latest development.

British cyclist David Millar expressed concern over what he believes will
be Armstrong’s “stage-managed” appearance and said he should be questioned,
instead, by an official body.

“Only Lance would get to have his moment of truth, if that’s what it will
be, in front of Oprah Winfrey,” said Millar, who served a two-year ban after
admitting doping in 2004 and then became a vocal campaigner against drugs in
sport.

“It is not sitting in front of a judge or a disciplinary hearing being
properly questioned about the things he has done wrong. I doubt very much it
will be a proper interrogation,” he added.

Armstrong’s unparalleled Tour de France winning streak between 1999 and
2005 once made him a beacon to youngsters.

Once a symbol of perseverance in the face of the most incredible odds, he
now seems destined to go down in history as one of the most brazen dope cheats
that sport has ever seen.

After sensationally conceding defeat in his fight to contest the charges
against him in August, the Texan’s world caved in further in October when the
International Cycling Union (UCI) erased him from the sport’s history.

Tygart’s US Anti-Doping Agency had already published a damning report that
laid bare his guilt, making a mockery of Armstrong’s denials, court actions
and an attempted comeback in 2009.

For his supporters, the doping allegations pale into comparison to his
battle with life-threatening cancer and the work of his charitable foundation,
which he founded to help others living with the disease.

Doctors had given Armstrong a less than 50 percent chance of survival when
he was diagnosed in 1996 with testicular cancer that had spread to his lungs
and brain.

He persevered through surgery and chemotherapy and returned to reach an
unprecedented pinnacle of cycling success, becoming a sporting icon synonymous
with phenomenal endurance.

“I for one am looking forward to hearing what he has to say. And regardless
of whether he cheated or not, I will always be a huge fan and have so much
admiration for everything he has achieved,” a supporter using the handle
lilsez13 wrote on OWN’s website.

“And it’s time that all of the haters, who never in their lives even saw
Lance Armstrong compete in any one of the seven Tour de France titles he won,
took some time out of writing their hate-filled rants, and listened to the man
himself. After all, he has done more good in this world than any of us could
ever compete with,” the writer added.

Armstrong’s years of dominance in the sport’s greatest race raised
cycling’s profile in the United States to new heights and gave him a singular
platform to promote cancer awareness and research.

The Lance Armstrong Foundation raised almost $500 million (340 million
euros, 310 million pounds) since its creation in 1997.

But in the aftermath of the allegations, several top sponsors dropped
Armstrong and the ultimate ignominy came on November 14 when his name was
dropped from the charity, which now is known simply as the Livestrong
Foundation.

Speak Your Mind

*