UCI Insists That Chris Froome Medication Broke No Rules

PARIS, June 15, 2014 (AFP) – The International Cycling Union (UCI) on
Sunday insisted that Britain’s Tour de France champion Chris Froome’s use of a
steroid-based drug in competition had not broken anti-doping rules.

According to a French Sunday newspaper, Froome was suffering from a chill
and was granted permission to use penisolone on his way to winning the Tour of
Romandie in Switzerland last April.

Froome was permitted to take up to 40mg of the drug a day in tablet form
after Team Sky doctor Alan Farrell was given the go ahead by UCI medical
director Mario Zorzoli.

However the UCI insisted that no rules had been broken and that Froome, who
lost his Criterium du Dauphine title on Sunday, had not been given any special

“Christopher Froome’s TUE (therapeutic use exemption) for oral use of
glucocorticosteroids was granted on April 29, 2014 based on duly documented
medical history and in compliance with the applicable UCI Regulations and the
relevant WADA guidelines,” read a UCI statement.

“The TUE was granted for a limited period, following the usual procedure.

“The process was fully transparent as it is UCI’s policy to systematically
record all TUEs on ADAMS. WADA was therefore informed throughout the process.

“The UCI wishes to emphasise that under the applicable rules – which are
consistent with the WADA Code and the WADA TUE Standard and Guidelines – any
rider with the same symptoms as Christopher Froome would have received a
similar TUE.”

Team Sky rejected the allegations and dismissed accusations of collusion
because UCI president Brian Cookson’s son is on the Sky staff.

“That’s ridiculous,” snapped team boss Dave Brailsford.

Cookson was president of British Cycling before his election as UCI supremo
last year and Brailsford said: “I’ve worked with Brian for 16 years at British
Cycling and no-one has ever said anything. His son works with us, but I don’t
think that raises any questions.”

He added: “Dr Zorzoli, the UCI doctor, told us what we could and couldn’t
do, we’ve always stayed within the rules, so we’ve got nothing to hide.”

Froome, meanwhile, was forced to defend his use of an inhaler on his way to
winning the second stage of the Criterium du Dauphine last week.

“I have had an inhaler since childhood, I have exercise induced asthma,”
said the Tour de France winner. “It is ok. I didn’t need a TUE.”